On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:54 PM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
wrote:
>
> On 18/6/21 5:12 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 5:05 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
> > wrote:
> >> On 18/6/21 1:12 am, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:36:45AM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
On 18/6/21 5:12 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 5:05 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
wrote:
On 18/6/21 1:12 am, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:36:45AM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
This patch ensures that the device's master mutex is acquired before
accessing
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 5:05 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
wrote:
> On 18/6/21 1:12 am, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:36:45AM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
> >> This patch ensures that the device's master mutex is acquired before
> >> accessing pointers to struct drm_master
On 18/6/21 1:12 am, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:36:45AM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
This patch ensures that the device's master mutex is acquired before
accessing pointers to struct drm_master that are subsequently
dereferenced. Without the mutex, the struct drm_maste
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:36:45AM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
> This patch ensures that the device's master mutex is acquired before
> accessing pointers to struct drm_master that are subsequently
> dereferenced. Without the mutex, the struct drm_master may be freed
> concurrently by anoth
