Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] drm: Include the encoder itself in possible_clones

2020-02-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:59:45PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > The docs say possible_clones should always include the encoder itself. > Since most drivers don't want to deal with the complexities of cloning > let's allow them to set possible_clones=0 and instead we'll fi

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] drm: Include the encoder itself in possible_clones

2020-02-07 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:28:35PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 07.02.20 um 14:59 schrieb Ville Syrjala: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > The docs say possible_clones should always include the encoder itself. > > Since most drivers don't want to deal with the complexities of clonin

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] drm: Include the encoder itself in possible_clones

2020-02-07 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 07.02.20 um 14:59 schrieb Ville Syrjala: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > The docs say possible_clones should always include the encoder itself. > Since most drivers don't want to deal with the complexities of cloning > let's allow them to set possible_clones=0 and instead we'll fix that > up in