Re: [PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously

2019-10-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:31:07AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:08:22PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 14:16 -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:45:41PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > > When reprobing an MST topology during resume, we

Re: [PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously

2019-09-27 Thread Sean Paul
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:08:22PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 14:16 -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:45:41PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > When reprobing an MST topology during resume, we have to account for the > > > fact that while we were suspended it

Re: [PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously

2019-09-25 Thread Lyude Paul
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 14:16 -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:45:41PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > When reprobing an MST topology during resume, we have to account for the > > fact that while we were suspended it's possible that mstbs may have been > > removed from any ports in t

Re: [PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously

2019-09-25 Thread Sean Paul
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:45:41PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > When reprobing an MST topology during resume, we have to account for the > fact that while we were suspended it's possible that mstbs may have been > removed from any ports in the topology. Since iterating downwards in the > topology req