On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 01:28:07PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The __malloc attribute should not be applied to "realloc" functions, as
> the returned pointer may alias the storage of the prior pointer. Instead
> of splitting __malloc from __alloc_size, which would be a huge amount of
> churn, just cr
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:36 AM Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Kees Cook writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:26:15AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kees Cook wrote:
> >> > The __malloc attribute should not be applied to "realloc" functions, as
Kees Cook writes:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:26:15AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kees Cook wrote:
>> > The __malloc attribute should not be applied to "realloc" functions, as
>> > the returned pointer may alias the storage of the prior pointer. Instead
>
On 9/28/22 19:13, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:26:15AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Kees,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kees Cook wrote:
The __malloc attribute should not be applied to "realloc" functions, as
the returned pointer may alias the storage of the prior poi
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:26:15AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kees Cook wrote:
> > The __malloc attribute should not be applied to "realloc" functions, as
> > the returned pointer may alias the storage of the prior pointer. Instead
> > of spli
On 9/28/22 09:26, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Kees,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kees Cook wrote:
The __malloc attribute should not be applied to "realloc" functions, as
the returned pointer may alias the storage of the prior pointer. Instead
of splitting __malloc from __alloc_size, which
Hi Kees,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kees Cook wrote:
> The __malloc attribute should not be applied to "realloc" functions, as
> the returned pointer may alias the storage of the prior pointer. Instead
> of splitting __malloc from __alloc_size, which would be a huge amount of
> churn, just
