Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On 2018-08-02 08:06, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-08-01 11:35, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> I don't think it's a problem with the atmel I2C driver. IIRC, the >>> tda998x driver issues the command a initiate the EDID read, but th

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:50:37PM +, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-08-02 08:06, Peter Rosin wrote: > > On 2018-08-01 11:35, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > >>> I don't think it's a problem with the atmel I2C driver. IIRC, the >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:53:57AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-07-31 09:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:44:24AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> On 2018-07-30 18:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> This is a re-posting of the series I r

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On 2018-07-31 09:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:44:24AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-07-30 18:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is a re-posting of the series I responded to Peter Rosin's May >>> posting, with a few bugs fixed, and the

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > I don't think it's a problem with the atmel I2C driver. IIRC, the > tda998x driver issues the command a initiate the EDID read, but that > times out. So it appears to be the TDA19988 that fails to read the > EDID over the DDC bus? Which

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On 2018-08-01 11:35, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> I don't think it's a problem with the atmel I2C driver. IIRC, the >> tda998x driver issues the command a initiate the EDID read, but that >> times out. So it appears to be the TDA1

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On 2018-07-31 13:15, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:43:34PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-07-31 11:23, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:53:57AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2018-07-31 09:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:44:24AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-07-30 18:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is a re-posting of the series I responded to Peter Rosin's May > > posting, with a few bugs fixed, and the bridge registered outside of > > the component helper.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On 2018-07-31 11:23, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:53:57AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-07-31 09:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:44:24AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2018-07-30 18:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:43:34PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-07-31 11:23, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:53:57AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> On 2018-07-31 09:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:44:24AM +0200, Peter Rosin

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tda998x: allow use with bridge based devices

On 2018-07-30 18:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Hi, > > This is a re-posting of the series I responded to Peter Rosin's May > posting, with a few bugs fixed, and the bridge registered outside of > the component helper. This should allow Peter to use the driver > while maintaining armada dr