Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] drm: byteorder fixes

2019-01-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:08 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 05:26 Daniel Vetter > >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:43:42AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:11:09AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:08 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] drm: byteorder fixes

2019-01-11 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 05:26 Daniel Vetter On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:43:42AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:11:09AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:08 AM Gerd Hoffmann > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:17:47AM -0500, Ilia

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] drm: byteorder fixes

2019-01-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:43:42AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:11:09AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:08 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:17:47AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > > > Hi Gerd, > > > > > > > > What h

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] drm: byteorder fixes

2019-01-11 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:11:09AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:08 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:17:47AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > > Hi Gerd, > > > > > > What happened with this series (and the next one)? > > > > Landed upstream in 4.20.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] drm: byteorder fixes

2019-01-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:08 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:17:47AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > Hi Gerd, > > > > What happened with this series (and the next one)? > > Landed upstream in 4.20. > > > Semi-relatedly, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just dump the > > B

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] drm: byteorder fixes

2019-01-11 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:17:47AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Hi Gerd, > > What happened with this series (and the next one)? Landed upstream in 4.20. > Semi-relatedly, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just dump the > BIG_ENDIAN flag and just define the "host" format to be the right one > f

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] drm: byteorder fixes

2019-01-10 Thread Ilia Mirkin
Hi Gerd, What happened with this series (and the next one)? Semi-relatedly, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just dump the BIG_ENDIAN flag and just define the "host" format to be the right one for a consistent little-endian interpretation. Cheers, -ilia On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:04 AM Ge