On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 01:24:22PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > Sounds good to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: Pekka Paalanen
>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula
>
> > If it turns out that these cannot be completely removed, then yet
> > another option would to refuse
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Pekka Paalanen
Acked-by: Jani Nikula
> If it turns out that these cannot be completely removed, then yet
> another option would to refuse to use these on digital connectors.
Or provide them as binaries to the linux-
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:26:36 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The EDID firmware loading mechanism introduced a few built-in EDIDs that
> could be forced on any connector, bypassing the EDIDs it exposes.
>
> While convenient, this limited set of EDIDs doesn't take into account
> the connector type, a
