On 12/14/23 21:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:43:16PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 12/4/23 15:55, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Okay, that means s/_locked/_nolock/ in drm_gem_shmem_helpers.{c,h}, I
guess.
>>
>> DRM subsys and majority of kernel uses common _locked pos
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:43:16PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 12/4/23 15:55, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> Okay, that means s/_locked/_nolock/ in drm_gem_shmem_helpers.{c,h}, I
> >> guess.
>
> DRM subsys and majority of kernel uses common _locked postfix. We should
> retain the old naming sche
On 12/4/23 15:55, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Okay, that means s/_locked/_nolock/ in drm_gem_shmem_helpers.{c,h}, I
>> guess.
DRM subsys and majority of kernel uses common _locked postfix. We should
retain the old naming scheme by using _locked() in DRM. It's not
worthwhile changing the name to a much
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 04:47:05PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:15:27 +0100
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > > Now, let's assume we drop the _locked() suffix on
> > > drm_gem_shmem_v[un]map(), but keep it on other helpers that need both
> > > variants. This results in an inc
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:15:27 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Now, let's assume we drop the _locked() suffix on
> > drm_gem_shmem_v[un]map(), but keep it on other helpers that need both
> > variants. This results in an inconsistent naming scheme inside the
> > same source file, which I find utterly
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:46:09PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:09:47 +0100
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 08:53:30AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 01:05:14 +0300
> > > Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 11/28/23 1
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:09:47 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 08:53:30AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 01:05:14 +0300
> > Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/28/23 15:37, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:14:42 +0100
> > > >
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 08:53:30AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 01:05:14 +0300
> Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> > On 11/28/23 15:37, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:14:42 +0100
> > > Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Nov 24, 202
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 13:47:21 +0300
Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 11/29/23 10:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 01:05:14 +0300
> > Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/28/23 15:37, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:14:42 +0100
> >>> Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
On 11/29/23 10:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 01:05:14 +0300
> Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
>> On 11/28/23 15:37, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:14:42 +0100
>>> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:59:11AM +0100, Boris Brezill
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 01:05:14 +0300
Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 11/28/23 15:37, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:14:42 +0100
> > Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:59:11AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:40:06 +0
On 11/28/23 15:37, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:14:42 +0100
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:59:11AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:40:06 +0100
>>> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:01:43AM +03
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:14:42 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:59:11AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:40:06 +0100
> > Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:01:43AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > > > Add locked a
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:59:11AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:40:06 +0100
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:01:43AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > > Add locked and remove unlocked postfixes from drm-shmem function names,
> > > making names
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:40:06 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:01:43AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > Add locked and remove unlocked postfixes from drm-shmem function names,
> > making names consistent with the drm/gem core code.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon
> >
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:40:06 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:01:43AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > Add locked and remove unlocked postfixes from drm-shmem function names,
> > making names consistent with the drm/gem core code.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon
> >
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:01:43AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Add locked and remove unlocked postfixes from drm-shmem function names,
> making names consistent with the drm/gem core code.
>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon
> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
Thi
17 matches
Mail list logo