Re: [PATCH libdrm 1/2] intel: Do not use libpciaccess on Android

2018-03-28 Thread Emil Velikov
On 27 March 2018 at 00:27, John Stultz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Emil Velikov > wrote: >> From: Tomasz Figa >> >> This patch makes the code not rely anymore on libpciaccess when compiled >> for Android to eliminate ioperm() and iopl() syscalls required by that >> library. As a

Re: [PATCH libdrm 1/2] intel: Do not use libpciaccess on Android

2018-03-27 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Tomasz Figa > > This patch makes the code not rely anymore on libpciaccess when compiled > for Android to eliminate ioperm() and iopl() syscalls required by that > library. As a side effect, the mappable aperture size is hardcoded to 64

Re: [PATCH libdrm 1/2] intel: Do not use libpciaccess on Android

2018-03-26 Thread John Stultz
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Tomasz Figa > > This patch makes the code not rely anymore on libpciaccess when compiled > for Android to eliminate ioperm() and iopl() syscalls required by that > library. As a side effect, the mappable aperture size is hardcoded to 6

Re: [PATCH libdrm 1/2] intel: Do not use libpciaccess on Android

2018-03-21 Thread Emil Velikov
On 20 March 2018 at 18:47, Eric Engestrom wrote: > On Tuesday, 2018-03-20 17:36:51 +, Emil Velikov wrote: >> From: Tomasz Figa >> >> This patch makes the code not rely anymore on libpciaccess when compiled >> for Android to eliminate ioperm() and iopl() syscalls required by that >> library. A

Re: [PATCH libdrm 1/2] intel: Do not use libpciaccess on Android

2018-03-20 Thread Eric Engestrom
On Tuesday, 2018-03-20 17:36:51 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Tomasz Figa > > This patch makes the code not rely anymore on libpciaccess when compiled > for Android to eliminate ioperm() and iopl() syscalls required by that > library. As a side effect, the mappable aperture size is hardcoded