On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:20:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:09:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
> > > the vblank timestamp c
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:09:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
> > the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic
> > semantics, i915 has some n
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
> the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic
> semantics, i915 has some nice sanity checks to make sure we keep
> getting this right. Move them
