Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm: Check mode object lease status in all master ioctl paths

2017-04-09 Thread Keith Packard
Daniel Vetter writes: > I think it'd be good if we could consolidate all the lease checking into > drm_mode_object_find (respectively __drm_mode_object_find). We'd need to > wire up the fpriv to be able to do that, but we could upstream that patch > right away before anything else. That should ta

Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm: Check mode object lease status in all master ioctl paths

2017-04-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 09:37:16AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > Daniel Vetter writes: > > > I think it'd be good if we could consolidate all the lease checking into > > drm_mode_object_find (respectively __drm_mode_object_find). We'd need to > > wire up the fpriv to be able to do that, but we co

Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm: Check mode object lease status in all master ioctl paths

2017-04-02 Thread Keith Packard
Daniel Vetter writes: > I think it'd be good if we could consolidate all the lease checking into > drm_mode_object_find (respectively __drm_mode_object_find). We'd need to > wire up the fpriv to be able to do that, but we could upstream that patch > right away before anything else. That should ta

Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm: Check mode object lease status in all master ioctl paths

2017-04-02 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 10:08:40AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > Attempts to modify un-leased objects are rejected with an error. > Information returned about unleased objects is modified to make them > appear unusable and/or disconnected. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard Just a merge-technical