Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/edid: no CEA extension is not an error

2019-09-02 Thread Jean Delvare
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 14:46:51 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 06:16:52PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > It is fine for displays without audio functionality to not implement > > CEA extension in their EDID. Do not return an error in that case, > > instead return 0 as if there was

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/edid: no CEA extension is not an error

2019-09-02 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 01:55:21PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 14:46:51 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 06:16:52PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > It is fine for displays without audio functionality to not implement > > > CEA extension in their EDID. Do

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/edid: no CEA extension is not an error

2019-09-02 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 06:16:52PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > It is fine for displays without audio functionality to not implement > CEA extension in their EDID. Do not return an error in that case, > instead return 0 as if there was a CEA extension with no audio or > speaker block. > > This fix