Hi Daniel,
On 2013년 07월 01일 23:56, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:06:32PM +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
>>> If raw_edid is null, it will crash, so checking in bad label is
>>> meaningless.
>>
>> It would be an error on pa
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:06:32PM +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
>> If raw_edid is null, it will crash, so checking in bad label is
>> meaningless.
>
> It would be an error on part of the caller, but the defense looks sane.
> As the function is
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:06:32PM +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
> If raw_edid is null, it will crash, so checking in bad label is
> meaningless.
It would be an error on part of the caller, but the defense looks sane.
As the function is a bool, I would have preferred it returned
true/false, but your
