On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:56:28PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:07:58PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Do the refresh rate calculation with a single division. This gives
> > us slightly more accurate results, especially for interlaced since
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:56:28PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:07:58PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Do the refresh rate calculation with a single division. This gives
> > us slightly more accurate results, especially for interlaced since
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:07:58PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Do the refresh rate calculation with a single division. This gives
> us slightly more accurate results, especially for interlaced since
> we don't just double the final truncated result.
>
> We do lose one b