On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
> > necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
> >
> > It adds a dynamic flag for both importers as
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
> necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
>
> It adds a dynamic flag for both importers as well as exporters
> so that drivers can choose if they want the reservat
Am 16.10.19 um 16:23 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:46 PM Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
>> Am 08.10.19 um 10:55 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:37:50AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Hi Daniel,
once more a ping on this. Any more comments or ca
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:46 PM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Am 08.10.19 um 10:55 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:37:50AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> once more a ping on this. Any more comments or can we get it comitted?
> > Sorry got a bit smash
Am 08.10.19 um 10:55 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:37:50AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> once more a ping on this. Any more comments or can we get it comitted?
> Sorry got a bit smashed past weeks, but should be resurrected now back
> from xdc.
And any m
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:37:50AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> once more a ping on this. Any more comments or can we get it comitted?
Sorry got a bit smashed past weeks, but should be resurrected now back
from xdc.
-Daniel
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> Am 24.09.19 um 11:50 s
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:29:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
> necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
>
> For compatibility we cache the DMA-buf mapping as soon as
> exporter/importer disagree on the dynamic handling.
Nee
Hi Daniel,
once more a ping on this. Any more comments or can we get it comitted?
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 24.09.19 um 11:50 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 17.09.19 um 16:56 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>> [SNIP]
+ /* When either the importer or the exporter
can't handl
Am 17.09.19 um 16:56 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> [SNIP]
>>> +/* When either the importer or the exporter can't handle
>>> dynamic
>>> + * mappings we cache the mapping here to avoid issues with the
>>> + * reservation object lock.
>>> + */
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Am 17.09.19 um 15:45 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:24:10PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> >> Am 17.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 17.09.19 um 15:45 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:24:10PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 17.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Mon, Sep 1
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:24:10PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 17.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> >> Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wr
Am 17.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >> Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the locking
> >> change?
> > I was at plumbers ...
Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the locking
>> change?
> I was at plumbers ...
>> Christian.
>>
>> Am 11.09.19 um 12:53 schrieb Christian König:
>>> Am 03.0
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the locking
> change?
I was at plumbers ...
>
> Christian.
>
> Am 11.09.19 um 12:53 schrieb Christian König:
> > Am 03.09.19 um 10:05 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > On Th
Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the locking
change?
Christian.
Am 11.09.19 um 12:53 schrieb Christian König:
Am 03.09.19 um 10:05 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:29:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
This patch is a stripped down version of the
Am 03.09.19 um 10:05 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:29:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
For compatibility we cache the DMA-buf mapping as soon as
exporter/importer di
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:29:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
> necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
>
> For compatibility we cache the DMA-buf mapping as soon as
> exporter/importer disagree on the dynamic handling.
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
