Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 15:34 +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld: > > On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote: > > > Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld: > > > > On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote: > > > > > Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

On 01/09/2022 09:00, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 18:32 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 15:53, Matthew Auld wrote: On 31/08/2022 14:34, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matt

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

Am 31.08.22 um 18:32 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 15:53, Matthew Auld wrote: On 31/08/2022 14:34, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian Kön

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

On 31/08/2022 15:53, Matthew Auld wrote: On 31/08/2022 14:34, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matt

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

On 31/08/2022 14:34, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew Auld: [SNIP] That hopefully just le

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew Auld: [SNIP] That hopefully just leaves i915_ttm_shrink(), which is swapping ou

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew Auld: [SNIP] That hopefully just leaves i915_ttm_shrink(), which is swapping out shmem ttm_tt and is calling ttm_bo_validat

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew Auld: [SNIP] That hopefully just leaves i915_ttm_shrink(), which is swapping out shmem ttm_tt and is calling ttm_bo_validate() with empty placements to force the pipel

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew Auld: [SNIP] That hopefully just leaves i915_ttm_shrink(), which is swapping out shmem ttm_tt and is calling ttm_bo_validate() with empty placements to force the pipeline-gutting path, which importantly unpopula

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew Auld: [SNIP] That hopefully just leaves i915_ttm_shrink(), which is swapping out shmem ttm_tt and is calling ttm_bo_validate() with empty placements to force the pipeline-gutting path, which importantly unpopulates the ttm_tt for us (since ttm_tt_unpopula

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

On 31/08/2022 10:38, Christian König wrote: Am 31.08.22 um 11:26 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 09:16, Christian König wrote: Hi Matthew, Am 30.08.22 um 12:45 schrieb Matthew Auld: Hi, On 30/08/2022 08:33, Christian König wrote: Hi guys, can we get an rb/acked-by for this i915 change?

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

Am 31.08.22 um 11:26 schrieb Matthew Auld: On 31/08/2022 09:16, Christian König wrote: Hi Matthew, Am 30.08.22 um 12:45 schrieb Matthew Auld: Hi, On 30/08/2022 08:33, Christian König wrote: Hi guys, can we get an rb/acked-by for this i915 change? Basically we are just making sure that the

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

On 31/08/2022 09:16, Christian König wrote: Hi Matthew, Am 30.08.22 um 12:45 schrieb Matthew Auld: Hi, On 30/08/2022 08:33, Christian König wrote: Hi guys, can we get an rb/acked-by for this i915 change? Basically we are just making sure that the driver doesn't crash when bo->resource is N

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

Hi Matthew, Am 30.08.22 um 12:45 schrieb Matthew Auld: Hi, On 30/08/2022 08:33, Christian König wrote: Hi guys, can we get an rb/acked-by for this i915 change? Basically we are just making sure that the driver doesn't crash when bo->resource is NULL and a bo doesn't have any backing store a

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

Hi, On 30/08/2022 08:33, Christian König wrote: Hi guys, can we get an rb/acked-by for this i915 change? Basically we are just making sure that the driver doesn't crash when bo->resource is NULL and a bo doesn't have any backing store assigned to it. The Intel CI seems to be happy with thi

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

Hi guys, can we get an rb/acked-by for this i915 change? Basically we are just making sure that the driver doesn't crash when bo->resource is NULL and a bo doesn't have any backing store assigned to it. The Intel CI seems to be happy with this change, so I'm pretty sure it is correct. Than

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: audit bo->resource usage

On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 12:46, Christian König wrote: > > Make sure we can at least move and alloc TT objects without backing store. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 6 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 2 +- > 2 files