2017-01-11 17:59 GMT+01:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> CONFIG_DRM_VM=y
>>
>> Does randconfig just set this for fun, despite that it's a hidden
>> Kconfig symbol? Should we add a depends !NOMMU
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> CONFIG_DRM_VM=y
>
> Does randconfig just set this for fun, despite that it's a hidden
> Kconfig symbol? Should we add a depends !NOMMU to it to make sure it
> never gets enabled when i
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:27:13 PM CET Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 02:33:34PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > When building DRM without an MMU, we run into a compile-time error because
>> > pte_wrprotect() is not d
On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:27:13 PM CET Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 02:33:34PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > When building DRM without an MMU, we run into a compile-time error because
> > pte_wrprotect() is not defined:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c: In function 'drm_
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 02:33:34PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When building DRM without an MMU, we run into a compile-time error because
> pte_wrprotect() is not defined:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c: In function 'drm_mmap_dma':
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c:496:9: error: implicit declaration of f
