Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/ttm: Ignore signaled move fences

2021-03-05 Thread Felix Kuehling
It fixed an intermittent failure to allocate page tables in the page fault handler (turning retry faults into no-retry faults). I'm not sure if this caused real problems. I think it could potentially result in fault storms and a failure to report page faults properly. I'm not sure if it's a regress

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/ttm: Ignore signaled move fences

2021-03-04 Thread Christian König
Am 05.03.21 um 02:21 schrieb Felix Kuehling: Am 2021-03-01 um 10:09 a.m. schrieb Christian König: Am 27.02.21 um 04:45 schrieb Felix Kuehling: Move fences that have already signaled should not prevent memory allocations with no_wait_gpu. Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling Reviewed-by: Christian

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/ttm: Ignore signaled move fences

2021-03-04 Thread Felix Kuehling
Am 2021-03-01 um 10:09 a.m. schrieb Christian König: > Am 27.02.21 um 04:45 schrieb Felix Kuehling: >> Move fences that have already signaled should not prevent memory >> allocations with no_wait_gpu. >> >> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling > > Reviewed-by: Christian König I work on this on Alex's

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/ttm: Ignore signaled move fences

2021-03-01 Thread Christian König
Am 27.02.21 um 04:45 schrieb Felix Kuehling: Move fences that have already signaled should not prevent memory allocations with no_wait_gpu. Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling Reviewed-by: Christian König --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)