Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-11 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:22:26PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > On 11/11/2011 04:47 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:49:39AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >>On 11/11/2011 12:33 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > >>>On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:05:22PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrot

Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-11 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/11/2011 04:47 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:49:39AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: On 11/11/2011 12:33 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:05:22PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: On 11/10/2011 07:05 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:

Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-11 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:49:39AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > On 11/11/2011 12:33 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:05:22PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >>On 11/10/2011 07:05 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > >>>On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:27:33AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrot

Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-11 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/11/2011 09:47 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: What are the symptoms of the failure you're seeing with Radeon? Any suggestions on why it happens? I suspect radeon swapping might have some issues, I really think we should put the effort into a test suite like the intel-gpu-tools, instead of mov

Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-11 Thread Dave Airlie
> What are the symptoms of the failure you're seeing with Radeon? Any > suggestions on why it happens? I suspect radeon swapping might have some issues, I really think we should put the effort into a test suite like the intel-gpu-tools, instead of moving code around with no idea what is better or

Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-10 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/11/2011 12:33 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:05:22PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: On 11/10/2011 07:05 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:27:33AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: On 11/09/2011 09:22 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-10 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:05:22PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > On 11/10/2011 07:05 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:27:33AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >>On 11/09/2011 09:22 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>From: Jerome Glisse > >>> > >>>This is an overhaul of the

Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-10 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/10/2011 07:05 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:27:33AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: On 11/09/2011 09:22 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jerome Glisse This is an overhaul of the ttm memory accounting. This tries to keep the same global behavior while rem

Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-10 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:27:33AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > On 11/09/2011 09:22 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote: > >From: Jerome Glisse > > > >This is an overhaul of the ttm memory accounting. This tries to keep > >the same global behavior while removing the whole zone concept. It > >keeps a d

Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/ttm: overhaul memory accounting

2011-11-10 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 11/09/2011 09:22 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jerome Glisse This is an overhaul of the ttm memory accounting. This tries to keep the same global behavior while removing the whole zone concept. It keeps a distrinction for dma32 so that we make sure that ttm don't starve the dma32 zone.