On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 07:24:44AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2021, 04:59 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:19:20PM +, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 14:59 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > /**
> > > * struct_group(NAME, MEMBERS)
>
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021, 04:59 Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:19:20PM +, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 14:59 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > /**
> > * struct_group(NAME, MEMBERS)
> > *
> > @@ -67,7 +73,10 @@ enum {
> > * @NAME: The name of the mirrored sub-
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:19:20PM +, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 14:59 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:54:18PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > > On 27/07/2021 22.57, Kees Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > > In order to have a regular programmatic way to desc
On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 14:59 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:54:18PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > On 27/07/2021 22.57, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > In order to have a regular programmatic way to describe a struct
> > > region that can be used for references and sizing, can
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:54:18PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 27/07/2021 22.57, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > In order to have a regular programmatic way to describe a struct
> > region that can be used for references and sizing, can be examined for
> > bounds checking, avoids forcing the use of
On 27/07/2021 22.57, Kees Cook wrote:
> In order to have a regular programmatic way to describe a struct
> region that can be used for references and sizing, can be examined for
> bounds checking, avoids forcing the use of intermediate identifiers,
> and avoids polluting the global namespace, intr
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 01:57:55PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Kernel code has a regular need to describe groups of members within a
> structure usually when they need to be copied or initialized separately
> from the rest of the surrounding structure. The generally accepted design
> pattern in C is
