Maxime Ripard writes:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 08:59:01AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 18.03.24 um 03:35 schrieb Zack Rusin:
>> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:48 AM Thomas Zimmermann
>> > wrote:
>> > > Framebuffer memory is allocated via vmalloc() from non-contiguous
>> > > ph
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 08:59:01AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.03.24 um 03:35 schrieb Zack Rusin:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:48 AM Thomas Zimmermann
> > wrote:
> > > Framebuffer memory is allocated via vmalloc() from non-contiguous
> > > physical pages. The physical frameb
Hi
Am 17.03.24 um 13:43 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
Thomas Zimmermann writes:
Hello Thomas,
Framebuffer memory is allocated via vmalloc() from non-contiguous
It's vmalloc() true, but through vzmalloc() so I would mention that
function instead in the commit message.
Ok.
physical
Hi
Am 18.03.24 um 03:35 schrieb Zack Rusin:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:48 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Framebuffer memory is allocated via vmalloc() from non-contiguous
physical pages. The physical framebuffer start address is therefore
meaningless. Do not set it.
The value is not used within
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:48 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Framebuffer memory is allocated via vmalloc() from non-contiguous
> physical pages. The physical framebuffer start address is therefore
> meaningless. Do not set it.
>
> The value is not used within the kernel and only exported to users
Thomas Zimmermann writes:
Hello Thomas,
> Framebuffer memory is allocated via vmalloc() from non-contiguous
It's vmalloc() true, but through vzmalloc() so I would mention that
function instead in the commit message.
> physical pages. The physical framebuffer start address is therefore
> meanin