Re: [PATCH 01/25] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:37:19PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:19 PM Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:13 AM Daniel Vetter > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:57 PM Christian König > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Could we merge this contr

Re: [PATCH 01/25] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 02:39, Christian König wrote: > > Am 13.07.20 um 18:26 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > Hi Christian, > > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 04:57:21PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > >> Could we merge this controlled by a separate config option? > >> > >> This way we could have the chec

Re: [PATCH 01/25] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

Am 13.07.20 um 18:26 schrieb Daniel Vetter: Hi Christian, On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 04:57:21PM +0200, Christian König wrote: Could we merge this controlled by a separate config option? This way we could have the checks upstream without having to fix all the stuff before we do this? Discussions

Re: [PATCH 01/25] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

Hi Christian, On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 04:57:21PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Could we merge this controlled by a separate config option? > > This way we could have the checks upstream without having to fix all the > stuff before we do this? Discussions died out a bit, do you consider this a

Re: [PATCH 01/25] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:19 PM Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:13 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:57 PM Christian König > > wrote: > > > > > > Could we merge this controlled by a separate config option? > > > > > > This way we could have the checks ups

Re: [PATCH 01/25] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:13 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:57 PM Christian König > wrote: > > > > Could we merge this controlled by a separate config option? > > > > This way we could have the checks upstream without having to fix all the > > stuff before we do this? > > S

Re: [PATCH 01/25] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:57 PM Christian König wrote: > > Could we merge this controlled by a separate config option? > > This way we could have the checks upstream without having to fix all the > stuff before we do this? Since it's fully opt-in annotations nothing blows up if we don't merge any

Re: [PATCH 01/25] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

Could we merge this controlled by a separate config option? This way we could have the checks upstream without having to fix all the stuff before we do this? Thanks, Christian. Am 07.07.20 um 22:12 schrieb Daniel Vetter: Design is similar to the lockdep annotations for workers, but with some