On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:19 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:14:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> > > most of the discard valu
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:14:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> > most of the discard value lies and stop expending huge efforts on the
> > __devX stuff whic
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:07 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:12:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> > commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
> > Author: David S. Miller
> > Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
> >
> > Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
> >
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:12:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
> Author: David S. Miller
> Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
>
> Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
>
> This reverts commit e5cb966c0838e4da43a3b0751bdcac7fe719f7b
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> most of the discard value lies and stop expending huge efforts on the
> __devX stuff which adds huge complexity for no real gain.
I have long felt that those
See commit:
commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
Author: David S. Miller
Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
This reverts commit e5cb966c0838e4da43a3b0751bdcac7fe719f7b4.
It causes new build regressions with gcc-4.2 which
