Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Samstag, 13. Februar 2021, 12:19:57 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > On 11.02.2021 15:42, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021, 06:25:15 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > >> On 10.02.2021 12:15, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >> >Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET s

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hey Heiko, On 11.02.2021 15:42, Heiko Stübner wrote: Hi Sebastian, Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021, 06:25:15 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: Hey Heiko, On 10.02.2021 12:15, Heiko Stübner wrote: >Hi Sebastian, > >Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: >> Hi Sebastian, >

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021, 06:25:15 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > Hey Heiko, > > On 10.02.2021 12:15, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >Hi Sebastian, > > > >Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: > >> Hi Sebastian, > >> > >> I did some tests myself today as w

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hey Heiko, On 10.02.2021 12:15, Heiko Stübner wrote: Hi Sebastian, Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: Hi Sebastian, I did some tests myself today as well and can confirm your hdmi related finding - at least when plugged in on boot. I tried some combinations of c

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: > Hi Sebastian, > > I did some tests myself today as well and can confirm your > hdmi related finding - at least when plugged in on boot. > > I tried some combinations of camera vs. hdmi and it seems > really only whe

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, I did some tests myself today as well and can confirm your hdmi related finding - at least when plugged in on boot. I tried some combinations of camera vs. hdmi and it seems really only when hdmi is plugged in on boot (1) - boot - camera --> works (2) - boot - camera - hdmi plugge

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hey Heiko, On 03.02.2021 20:54, Heiko Stübner wrote: Hi Sebastian, Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021, 19:14:22 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: Hey Heiko, I have tested your patch set on my nanoPC-T4, here is a complete log with: - relevant kernel log entries - system information - media ctl output -

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 07:43:35 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > On 03.02.2021 20:54, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021, 19:14:22 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > >> I have tested your patch set on my nanoPC-T4, here is a complete log > >> with: > >> - relevant

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hey Heiko, I have tested your patch set on my nanoPC-T4, here is a complete log with: - relevant kernel log entries - system information - media ctl output - sysfs entry information https://paste.debian.net/1183874/ Additionally, to your patchset I have applied the following patches: https://gi

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021, 19:14:22 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > Hey Heiko, > > I have tested your patch set on my nanoPC-T4, here is a complete log > with: > - relevant kernel log entries > - system information > - media ctl output > - sysfs entry information > > https://pas