Re: [PATCH 0/2] GEM CMA DMA-BUF support

2013-04-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Monday 15 April 2013 09:52:33 Rob Clark wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday 28 March 2013 16:12:25 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Thursday 14 March 2013 15:05:29 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 15:45:36 Laurent Pinch

Re: [PATCH 0/2] GEM CMA DMA-BUF support

2013-04-15 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thursday 28 March 2013 16:12:25 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> On Thursday 14 March 2013 15:05:29 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 15:45:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > This two patches add suppor

Re: [PATCH 0/2] GEM CMA DMA-BUF support

2013-04-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Thursday 28 March 2013 16:12:25 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thursday 14 March 2013 15:05:29 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 15:45:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This two patches add support for GEM CMA objects import and export as > > > dma-buf file ha

Re: [PATCH 0/2] GEM CMA DMA-BUF support

2013-03-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, On Thursday 14 March 2013 15:05:29 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 15:45:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This two patches add support for GEM CMA objects import and export as > > dma-buf file handles. > > > > There's not much to be added about the patches

Re: [PATCH 0/2] GEM CMA DMA-BUF support

2013-03-14 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Tuesday 12 March 2013 15:45:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, > > This two patches add support for GEM CMA objects import and export as > dma-buf file handles. > > There's not much to be added about the patches themselves, they're pretty > self-explicit. The code is based on the Exynos DRM D