Am 08.10.24 um 05:38 schrieb Advait Dhamorikar:
Hi Christian,
I am not sure if I correctly understood what you meant, just to clarify
When you say this
No, all of this are numerical problems where not taken into account the
size of the destination type.
Saying that all of that are basically j
Hi Christian,
I am not sure if I correctly understood what you meant, just to clarify
When you say this
>No, all of this are numerical problems where not taken into account the
>size of the destination type.
>Saying that all of that are basically just style cleanups which doesn't
>need to be ba
Am 05.10.24 um 09:05 schrieb Advait Dhamorikar:
Hi Sathish,
Please collate the changes together with Lijo's suggestion as well,
"1ULL <<" instead of typecast, there are 3 occurrences of the error in
f0b19b84d391.
I could only observe two instances of this error in f0b19b84d391 at:
'mask = (1 <
Hi Sathish,
> Please collate the changes together with Lijo's suggestion as well,
> "1ULL <<" instead of typecast, there are 3 occurrences of the error in
> f0b19b84d391.
I could only observe two instances of this error in f0b19b84d391 at:
'mask = (1 << (adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_inst * adev->jpeg.num_
On 10/4/2024 11:30 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 5:15 AM Sundararaju, Sathishkumar
wrote:
All occurrences of this error fix should have been together in a single patch
both in _get and _set callbacks corresponding to f0b19b84d391, please avoid
separate patch for each occu
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 5:15 AM Sundararaju, Sathishkumar
wrote:
>
>
> All occurrences of this error fix should have been together in a single patch
> both in _get and _set callbacks corresponding to f0b19b84d391, please avoid
> separate patch for each occurrence.
>
> Sorry Alex, I missed to note
On 10/4/24 03:15, Sundararaju, Sathishkumar wrote:
All occurrences of this error fix should have been together in a single patch
both in _get and _set callbacks corresponding to f0b19b84d391, please avoid
separate patch for each occurrence.
Sorry Alex, I missed to note this yesterday.
Regar
All occurrences of this error fix should have been together in a single
patch both in _get and _set callbacks corresponding to f0b19b84d391,
please avoid separate patch for each occurrence.
Sorry Alex, I missed to note this yesterday.
Regards,
Sathish
On 10/4/2024 1:46 PM, Advait Dhamorik
On 10/3/2024 12:44 PM, Advait Dhamorikar wrote:
Fix overflow issue by casting uint8_t to uint64_t in JPEG
instance multiplication.
Thank you for the fix, u8 isn't the default it is usually treated as
int, is it okay to mention "fix shift-count-overflow in.."
or something else of your choice ,
