Re: [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-11 Thread Dixit, Ashutosh
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:31:33 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On March 11, 2021 20:26:06 "Dixit, Ashutosh" wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:00:49 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default > when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027

Re: [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-11 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On March 11, 2021 20:26:06 "Dixit, Ashutosh" wrote: On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:00:49 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027bef249a0cc3d511de05c2464e0a1e22 which landed Mar 2, 2010. The i9

Re: [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-11 Thread Dixit, Ashutosh
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:00:49 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default > when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027bef249a0cc3d511de05c2464e0a1e22 > which landed Mar 2, 2010. The i915 and i965 drivers in Mesa at the time > both used

Re: [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-10 Thread Keith Packard
Jason Ekstrand writes: > libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default > when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027bef249a0cc3d511de05c2464e0a1e22 > which landed Mar 2, 2010. The i915 and i965 drivers in Mesa at the time > both used libdrm and so did the Intel X11 ba