On 9/25/24 12:57 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 07:53:57PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 9/23/24 3:57 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Up till now the fsl,lcdif.yaml was requiring the "port" property as a
must have to specify the display interface on iMX devices.
However, it shall als
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 03:57:44PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Up till now the fsl,lcdif.yaml was requiring the "port" property as a
> must have to specify the display interface on iMX devices.
>
> However, it shall also be possible to specify the display only with
> passing its timing paramet
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 07:53:57PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 9/23/24 3:57 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Up till now the fsl,lcdif.yaml was requiring the "port" property as a
> > must have to specify the display interface on iMX devices.
> >
> > However, it shall also be possible to specify t
On 9/23/24 3:57 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Up till now the fsl,lcdif.yaml was requiring the "port" property as a
must have to specify the display interface on iMX devices.
However, it shall also be possible to specify the display only with
passing its timing parameters (h* and v* ones) via "disp