Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: lcdif: Add support for specifying display with timings

2024-09-24 Thread Marek Vasut
On 9/25/24 12:57 AM, Rob Herring wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 07:53:57PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: On 9/23/24 3:57 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: Up till now the fsl,lcdif.yaml was requiring the "port" property as a must have to specify the display interface on iMX devices. However, it shall als

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: lcdif: Add support for specifying display with timings

2024-09-24 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 03:57:44PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Up till now the fsl,lcdif.yaml was requiring the "port" property as a > must have to specify the display interface on iMX devices. > > However, it shall also be possible to specify the display only with > passing its timing paramet

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: lcdif: Add support for specifying display with timings

2024-09-24 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 07:53:57PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 9/23/24 3:57 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Up till now the fsl,lcdif.yaml was requiring the "port" property as a > > must have to specify the display interface on iMX devices. > > > > However, it shall also be possible to specify t

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: lcdif: Add support for specifying display with timings

2024-09-23 Thread Marek Vasut
On 9/23/24 3:57 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: Up till now the fsl,lcdif.yaml was requiring the "port" property as a must have to specify the display interface on iMX devices. However, it shall also be possible to specify the display only with passing its timing parameters (h* and v* ones) via "disp