Re: [PATCH] drm-misc: Next phase in small drivers in drm-misc

2017-04-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:23:08AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:38:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > I think the initial experiment worked fairly well, and the > > kickstarting of a review (well, ack/best practices really) market > > seems to work ok-ish too. I think we c

Re: [PATCH] drm-misc: Next phase in small drivers in drm-misc

2017-04-03 Thread Sean Paul
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:38:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I think the initial experiment worked fairly well, and the > kickstarting of a review (well, ack/best practices really) market > seems to work ok-ish too. I think we can try to make it (slowly) scale > to more drivers, with driver tea

Re: [PATCH] drm-misc: Next phase in small drivers in drm-misc

2017-03-29 Thread Shawn Guo
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:38:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I think the initial experiment worked fairly well, and the > kickstarting of a review (well, ack/best practices really) market > seems to work ok-ish too. I think we can try to make it (slowly) scale > to more drivers, with driver tea

Re: [PATCH] drm-misc: Next phase in small drivers in drm-misc

2017-03-29 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:38:15 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > I think the initial experiment worked fairly well, and the > kickstarting of a review (well, ack/best practices really) market > seems to work ok-ish too. I think we can try to make it (slowly) scale > to more drivers, with driver teams in