Re: [PATCH] drm: rockchip: Don't require MIPI DSI device when it's used for ISP

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:02:01AM +0800, Andy Yan wrote: > Hi Ondrej: > > On 2/18/24 23:17, Ondřej Jirman wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 07:14:56PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 2/18/24 02:39, Ondřej Jirman wrote: > > > > From: Ondrej Jirman > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] drm: rockchip: Don't require MIPI DSI device when it's used for ISP

Hi Ondrej: On 2/18/24 23:17, Ondřej Jirman wrote: Hi Andy, On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 07:14:56PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote: Hi, On 2/18/24 02:39, Ondřej Jirman wrote: From: Ondrej Jirman On RK3399 one MIPI DSI device can be alternatively used with the ISP1, to provide RX DPHY. When this is the ca

Re: [PATCH] drm: rockchip: Don't require MIPI DSI device when it's used for ISP

Hi Andy, On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 07:14:56PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/18/24 02:39, Ondřej Jirman wrote: > > From: Ondrej Jirman > > > > On RK3399 one MIPI DSI device can be alternatively used with the ISP1, > > to provide RX DPHY. When this is the case (ISP1 is enabled in device > >

Re: [PATCH] drm: rockchip: Don't require MIPI DSI device when it's used for ISP

Hi, On 2/18/24 02:39, Ondřej Jirman wrote: From: Ondrej Jirman On RK3399 one MIPI DSI device can be alternatively used with the ISP1, to provide RX DPHY. When this is the case (ISP1 is enabled in device tree), probe success of DRM is tied to probe success of ISP1 connected camera sensor. This