On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 01:16:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 1:14 PM Marius Vlad wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:58:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:36 PM Marius Vlad
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:34:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 1:14 PM Marius Vlad wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:58:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:36 PM Marius Vlad
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:34:00AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 11:21, Daniel V
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:58:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:36 PM Marius Vlad wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:34:00AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 11:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:36 PM Marius Vlad wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:34:00AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 11:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET drivers are allowed to
> > > pull in arbitrary other resources, includin
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 17:02, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 4:14 PM Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I think we need a guarantee that this never happens if ALLOW_MODESET
> > is always used in blocking mode, plus in future a cap we can use to
> > detect that we won't be getting spurio
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 4:14 PM Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 15:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:36 PM Marius Vlad
> > wrote:
> > > Gentle ping. I've tried out Linus's master tree and, and like Pekka,
> > > I've noticed this isn't integrated/added.
> >
>
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 15:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:36 PM Marius Vlad wrote:
> > Gentle ping. I've tried out Linus's master tree and, and like Pekka,
> > I've noticed this isn't integrated/added.
>
> Defacto the uapi we have now is that userspace needs to ignore "spurio
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:36 PM Marius Vlad wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:34:00AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 11:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET drivers are allowed to
> > > pull in arbitrary other resources, includin
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:34:00AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 11:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET drivers are allowed to
> > pull in arbitrary other resources, including CRTCs (e.g. when
> > reconfiguring global resources).
> >
>
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:40:21AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 08:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 9:18 AM Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 08:08, Daniel Vetter
> > > wrote:
> > > I'd be very much in favour of putting the blocking down
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 08:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 9:18 AM Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 08:08, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > I'd be very much in favour of putting the blocking down in the kernel
> > at least until the kernel can give us a clear indication t
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 9:18 AM Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 08:08, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Did anything happen with this?
> >
> > Nope. There's an igt now that fails with this, and I'm not sure
> > whether changing the igt is the right idea or not.
> >
> > I'm kinda
Hi,
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 08:08, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Did anything happen with this?
>
> Nope. There's an igt now that fails with this, and I'm not sure
> whether changing the igt is the right idea or not.
>
> I'm kinda now thinking about changing this to instead document under
> which exact
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:42 AM Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 17:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Resending because last attempt failed CI and meanwhile the results are
> > lost :-/
>
> Did anything happen with this?
Nope. There's an igt now that fails with this, and I'm not sure
whe
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 17:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Resending because last attempt failed CI and meanwhile the results are
> lost :-/
Did anything happen with this?
Cheers,
Daniel
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 11:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET drivers are allowed to
> pull in arbitrary other resources, including CRTCs (e.g. when
> reconfiguring global resources).
>
> But in nonblocking mode userspace has then no idea this happened,
> whic
16 matches
Mail list logo
