On 09/04/2017 04:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:36:25PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:07:16PM +0900, Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
If scanout started, we should reduce etime by delta_ns. But delta_ns
is negative if scanout has not started. If delta_ns is n
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:36:25PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:07:16PM +0900, Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
> > If scanout started, we should reduce etime by delta_ns. But delta_ns
> > is negative if scanout has not started. If delta_ns is negative,
> > subtraction of delta_ns fr
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:07:16PM +0900, Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
> If scanout started, we should reduce etime by delta_ns. But delta_ns
> is negative if scanout has not started. If delta_ns is negative,
> subtraction of delta_ns from etime increases etime. This is wrong, the
> etime should not be incr
