On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:48:35AM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> The code was making a copy of a struct ttm_resource. However,
> recently the struct ttm_resources were allowed to be subclassed and
> also were allowed to be malloced, hence the driver could end up assuming
> the copy we handed it
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 17:48, Thomas Hellström
wrote:
>
> The code was making a copy of a struct ttm_resource. However,
> recently the struct ttm_resources were allowed to be subclassed and
> also were allowed to be malloced, hence the driver could end up assuming
> the copy we handed it was subcl
Am 30.08.21 um 09:48 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
The code was making a copy of a struct ttm_resource. However,
recently the struct ttm_resources were allowed to be subclassed and
also were allowed to be malloced, hence the driver could end up assuming
the copy we handed it was subclassed and wor
