Javier Martinez Canillas writes:
> Dmitry Baryshkov writes:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 04:34:34PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> Dmitry Baryshkov writes:
>>>
>>> Hello Dmitry,
>>>
>>> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 12:44:58PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
Dmitry Baryshkov writes:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 04:34:34PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Dmitry Baryshkov writes:
>>
>> Hello Dmitry,
>>
>> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 12:44:58PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> >> Since the check is done even for built-in dri
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 04:34:34PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Dmitry Baryshkov writes:
>
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 12:44:58PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[...]
> >> Since the check is done even for built-in drivers, drop the condition to
> >> only d
Dmitry Baryshkov writes:
Hello Dmitry,
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 12:44:58PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The only reason for the ssd130x-spi driver to have an spi_device_id table
>> is that the SPI core always reports an "spi:" MODALIAS, even when the SPI
>> device has been register
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 12:44:58PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The only reason for the ssd130x-spi driver to have an spi_device_id table
> is that the SPI core always reports an "spi:" MODALIAS, even when the SPI
> device has been registered via a Device Tree Blob.
>
> Without spi_dev