On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:10:21AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 06:53:44PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 09:45:00AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 05:07:15PM +0200, Simona Vetter wrote:
> > > > We should definitely doc
On Wed, 2025-06-04 at 17:07 +0200, Simona Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > On 6/4/25 10:16, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > struct drm_sched_init_args provides the possibility of letting
> > > the
> > > scheduler use user-controlled workqueues, inste
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 06:53:44PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 09:45:00AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 05:07:15PM +0200, Simona Vetter wrote:
> > > We should definitely document this trick better though, I didn't find any
> > > place where tha
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 09:45:00AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 05:07:15PM +0200, Simona Vetter wrote:
> > We should definitely document this trick better though, I didn't find any
> > place where that was documented.
>
> This is a good idea.
I think - and I also mentione
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 05:07:15PM +0200, Simona Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > On 6/4/25 10:16, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > struct drm_sched_init_args provides the possibility of letting the
> > > scheduler use user-controlled workqueues, inst
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> On 6/4/25 10:16, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > struct drm_sched_init_args provides the possibility of letting the
> > scheduler use user-controlled workqueues, instead of the scheduler
> > creating its own workqueues. It's currently no
On 6/4/25 10:16, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> struct drm_sched_init_args provides the possibility of letting the
> scheduler use user-controlled workqueues, instead of the scheduler
> creating its own workqueues. It's currently not documented who would
> want to use that.
>
> Not sharing the submit_wq
