Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: fix possible lack of synchronization btw ttm and other ring

2012-05-04 Thread Christian König
On 04.05.2012 10:42, Dave Airlie wrote: From: Jerome Glisse We need to sync with the GFX ring as ttm might have schedule bo move on it and new command scheduled for other ring need to wait for bo data to be in place. Is this required for -fixes? if so it doesn't apply clean. Nope, only drm-nex

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: fix possible lack of synchronization btw ttm and other ring

2012-05-04 Thread Dave Airlie
>> >> From: Jerome Glisse >> >> We need to sync with the GFX ring as ttm might have schedule bo move >> on it and new command scheduled for other ring need to wait for bo >> data to be in place. >> Is this required for -fixes? if so it doesn't apply clean. Dave. ___

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: fix possible lack of synchronization btw ttm and other ring

2012-05-04 Thread Christian König
On 03.05.2012 19:44, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jerome Glisse We need to sync with the GFX ring as ttm might have schedule bo move on it and new command scheduled for other ring need to wait for bo data to be in place. Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse Reviewed-by: Christian König --- dri

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: fix possible lack of synchronization btw ttm and other ring

2012-05-03 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:44 PM, wrote: > From: Jerome Glisse > > We need to sync with the GFX ring as ttm might have schedule bo move > on it and new command scheduled for other ring need to wait for bo > data to be in place. > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher > --- >