On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 03:11:37PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 01:14:30PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Thierry,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:44:57AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:10:30AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > T
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 5:05 PM Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Rob Herring writes:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:45 AM Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:10:30AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> > The kernel has a device tree binding for panel-dpi which allows for the
> >> >
Rob Herring writes:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:45 AM Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:10:30AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > The kernel has a device tree binding for panel-dpi which allows for the
>> > panel timings to be described in the device-tree, however it wasn't
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:12 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Thierry.
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:39:24PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:01:48PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > > One thing that's not clear to me is whether or not we want to allow
> > > > video timings
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:45 AM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:10:30AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The kernel has a device tree binding for panel-dpi which allows for the
> > panel timings to be described in the device-tree, however it wasn't
> > supported so far except in
Hi Thierry.
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:39:24PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:01:48PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > One thing that's not clear to me is whether or not we want to allow
> > > video timings to be specified in DT. I used to think that we didn't,
> > > beca
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 01:14:30PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:44:57AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:10:30AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > The kernel has a device tree binding for panel-dpi which allows for the
> > >
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:01:48PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > One thing that's not clear to me is whether or not we want to allow
> > video timings to be specified in DT. I used to think that we didn't,
> > because the video timings are implied by the specific compatible string
> > (which we al
> One thing that's not clear to me is whether or not we want to allow
> video timings to be specified in DT. I used to think that we didn't,
> because the video timings are implied by the specific compatible string
> (which we already determined is mandatory anyway),
We often have two users of the
Hi Thierry,
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:44:57AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:10:30AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The kernel has a device tree binding for panel-dpi which allows for the
> > panel timings to be described in the device-tree, however it wasn't
> > suppo
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:10:30AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The kernel has a device tree binding for panel-dpi which allows for the
> panel timings to be described in the device-tree, however it wasn't
> supported so far except in a (small) number of KMS drivers that had an
> ad-hoc solution f
Maxime Ripard writes:
> The kernel has a device tree binding for panel-dpi which allows for the
> panel timings to be described in the device-tree, however it wasn't
> supported so far except in a (small) number of KMS drivers that had an
> ad-hoc solution for this (omapdrm for example).
I'm rea
12 matches
Mail list logo
