On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 07:39, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:24:43PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:28:53AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > >
> > > What I recommend is to look into why we disable it by default, I think
> >
> > I think FW_CA
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:24:43PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:28:53AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >
> > What I recommend is to look into why we disable it by default, I think
>
> I think FW_CACHE is enabled by default, no?
>
> > its sold old obscure reasonin
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:28:53AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>
> What I recommend is to look into why we disable it by default, I think
I think FW_CACHE is enabled by default, no?
> its sold old obscure reasoning but now suspect it was udev being dumb,
> in line with why we also try to defe
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:05:36PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > only force FW_CACHE if DRM_NOUVEAU_GSP_DEFAULT?
>
> Please scratch that, it was a horrible idea.
What I recommend is to look into why we disable it by default,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:05:36PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> only force FW_CACHE if DRM_NOUVEAU_GSP_DEFAULT?
Please scratch that, it was a horrible idea.
(+ Luis, Russ)
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 11:25:31AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> nouveau tries to load some firmware during suspend that it loaded earlier,
> but with
> fw caching disabled it hangs suspend, so just rely on FW cache enabling
> instead of
> working around it i
