On 2017-12-13 16:00:49 [+0200], Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 16:19 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > The code has an ifdef and uses two functions to either init the bare
> > spinlock or init it and set a lock-class. It is possible to do the same
> > thing without an ifde
+peterz
context: http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg149011.html
On 2017-12-13 17:37:21 [+0200], Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 16:06 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2017-12-13 16:00:49 [+0200], Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 16:19 +0100, Se
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 06:36:33PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> +peterz
> context: http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg149011.html
>
> On 2017-12-13 17:37:21 [+0200], Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 16:06 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2017-12-
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 16:06 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-12-13 16:00:49 [+0200], Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 16:19 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > The code has an ifdef and uses two functions to either init the bare
> > > spinlock or init it a
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 16:19 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The code has an ifdef and uses two functions to either init the bare
> spinlock or init it and set a lock-class. It is possible to do the same
> thing without an ifdef.
> With this patch (in debug case) we first use the "default"
