On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:02:26 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:18:02PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST is faster if the compiler knows it will only be
> > dealing with unsigned dividends. This optimization rips 32 bytes of
> > binary code on x86_64.
> >
> >
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:18:02PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST is faster if the compiler knows it will only be
> dealing with unsigned dividends. This optimization rips 32 bytes of
> binary code on x86_64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare
> Cc: Guenter Roeck
> Cc: Andrew Morton
