Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Ditch the i915_gem_ww_ctx loop member

On 8/16/21 3:34 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Op 16-08-2021 om 15:30 schreef Thomas Hellström: On 8/16/21 3:25 PM, Matthew Auld wrote: On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 09:49, Thomas Hellström wrote: It's only used by the for_i915_gem_ww() macro and we can use the (typically) on-stack _err variable in

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Ditch the i915_gem_ww_ctx loop member

Op 16-08-2021 om 15:30 schreef Thomas Hellström: > > On 8/16/21 3:25 PM, Matthew Auld wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 09:49, Thomas Hellström >> wrote: >>> It's only used by the for_i915_gem_ww() macro and we can use >>> the (typically) on-stack _err variable in its place. >>> >>> While initially

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Ditch the i915_gem_ww_ctx loop member

On 8/16/21 3:25 PM, Matthew Auld wrote: On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 09:49, Thomas Hellström wrote: It's only used by the for_i915_gem_ww() macro and we can use the (typically) on-stack _err variable in its place. While initially setting the _err variable to -EDEADLK to enter the loop, we clear it

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Ditch the i915_gem_ww_ctx loop member

On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 09:49, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > It's only used by the for_i915_gem_ww() macro and we can use > the (typically) on-stack _err variable in its place. > > While initially setting the _err variable to -EDEADLK to enter the > loop, we clear it before actually entering using fe