Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: tc358767: fix max_tu_symbol value

2019-11-06 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 10/10/2019 12:25, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: Hi Andrzej, On 10/10/2019 12:19, Andrzej Hajda wrote: On 24.09.2019 15:17, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: max_tu_symbol was programmed to TU_SIZE_RECOMMENDED - 1, which is not what the spec says. The spec says: roundup ((input active video bandwidth in bytes/

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: tc358767: fix max_tu_symbol value

2019-10-10 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi Andrzej, On 10/10/2019 12:19, Andrzej Hajda wrote: On 24.09.2019 15:17, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: max_tu_symbol was programmed to TU_SIZE_RECOMMENDED - 1, which is not what the spec says. The spec says: roundup ((input active video bandwidth in bytes/output active video bandwidth in bytes) * tu

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: tc358767: fix max_tu_symbol value

2019-10-10 Thread Andrzej Hajda
On 24.09.2019 15:17, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > max_tu_symbol was programmed to TU_SIZE_RECOMMENDED - 1, which is not > what the spec says. The spec says: > > roundup ((input active video bandwidth in bytes/output active video > bandwidth in bytes) * tu_size) > > It is not quite clear what the above m

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: tc358767: fix max_tu_symbol value

2019-09-25 Thread Jyri Sarha
On 24/09/2019 16:17, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > max_tu_symbol was programmed to TU_SIZE_RECOMMENDED - 1, which is not > what the spec says. The spec says: > > roundup ((input active video bandwidth in bytes/output active video > bandwidth in bytes) * tu_size) > > It is not quite clear what the above