Hello Dmitry,
> The patch LGTM, but the commit message needs some work. Why/how does
> TIDSS require bridges to use atomic ops?
In hindsight that indeed could've been worded better, the approach
here was as a stepping stone to implementing the input bus formats,
which is what TIDSS needs, so I'll
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 07:19:08PM +0100, Jesse Van Gavere wrote:
> Use the atomic version of enable/disable.
>
> Doing so enables it to work in a chain where atomic operations are expected
> such as TIDSS
The patch LGTM, but the commit message needs some work. Why/how does
TIDSS require bridges
