Am 10.11.22 um 15:33 schrieb Dong Chenchen:
When p->gang_size equals 0, amdgpu_cs_pass1() will return directly
without freeing chunk_array, which will cause a memory leak issue,
this patch fixes it.
Fixes: 4624459c84d7 ("drm/amdgpu: add gang submit frontend v6")
Signed-off-by: Dong Chenchen
G
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 1:08 PM Luben Tuikov wrote:
>
> Thanks for fixing this.
>
> Please add a Cc tag to stable, and repost.
No need for stable. This patch just went upstream in 6.1, so I can
include it in my 6.1 fixes pull next week. Applied.
Thanks!
Alex
>
> Reviewed-by: Luben Tuikov
>
Thanks for fixing this.
Please add a Cc tag to stable, and repost.
Reviewed-by: Luben Tuikov
Regards,
Luben
On 2022-11-10 09:33, Dong Chenchen wrote:
> When p->gang_size equals 0, amdgpu_cs_pass1() will return directly
> without freeing chunk_array, which will cause a memory leak issue,
> this
Applied. Thanks!
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:12 PM Rafael Mendonca wrote:
>
> If construction of the array of work queues to handle hpd_rx_irq offload
> work fails, we need to unwind. Destroy all the created workqueues and
> the allocated memory for the hpd_rx_irq_offload_work_queue struct array.
Am 21.10.19 um 20:09 schrieb Navid Emamdoost:
> In the impelementation of amdgpu_fence_emit() if dma_fence_wait() fails
> and returns an errno, before returning the allocated memory for fence
> should be released.
>
> Fixes: 3d2aca8c8620 ("drm/amdgpu: fix old fence check in amdgpu_fence_emit")
> Si
On 10/4/19 1:30 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 04.10.19 um 13:26 schrieb Das, Nirmoy:
>> On 10/4/19 1:13 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> NAK, that is a double free. The bo list entries are freed by
> amdgpu_bo_list_put().
Thanks, didn't realize that.
>>> Wait a second, what entries
Am 04.10.19 um 13:26 schrieb Das, Nirmoy:
> On 10/4/19 1:13 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
NAK, that is a double free. The bo list entries are freed by
amdgpu_bo_list_put().
>>> Thanks, didn't realize that.
>> Wait a second, what entries are you talking about?
>>
>> The entries in the list
On 10/4/19 1:13 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>
>>> NAK, that is a double free. The bo list entries are freed by
>>> amdgpu_bo_list_put().
>> Thanks, didn't realize that.
> Wait a second, what entries are you talking about?
>
> The entries in the list object are freed when amdgpu_bo_list_put() is
>
Am 04.10.19 um 13:00 schrieb Das, Nirmoy:
> On 10/4/19 12:44 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> First of all please send mails regarding amdgpu to the amd-gfx mailing
>> list and not lkml/dri-devel.
> Okay.
>> Am 04.10.19 um 12:17 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>> In amdgpu_bo_list_ioctl when idr_alloc fails
>>
On 10/4/19 12:44 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> First of all please send mails regarding amdgpu to the amd-gfx mailing
> list and not lkml/dri-devel.
Okay.
> Am 04.10.19 um 12:17 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>> In amdgpu_bo_list_ioctl when idr_alloc fails
>> don't return without freeing bo list entry.
>>
>
First of all please send mails regarding amdgpu to the amd-gfx mailing
list and not lkml/dri-devel.
Am 04.10.19 um 12:17 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> In amdgpu_bo_list_ioctl when idr_alloc fails
> don't return without freeing bo list entry.
>
> Fixes: 964d0fbf6301d ("drm/amdgpu: Allow to create BO lists
11 matches
Mail list logo
