Hi Harry,
I noticed this patch is already in mainline, but the stable tag
was removed. What is the reason for that if this bug is present
in stable?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 1/3/19 3:11 PM, Wentland, Harry wrote:
> On 2019-01-03 2:48 p.m., Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Fix boolean expression by usi
On 3/21/19 10:14 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 22:10 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Hi Harry,
>>
>> I noticed this patch is already in mainline, but the stable tag
>> was removed. What is the reason for that if this bug is present
>> in stable?
>
> It's not a bug, it's ju
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 22:10 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Harry,
>
> I noticed this patch is already in mainline, but the stable tag
> was removed. What is the reason for that if this bug is present
> in stable?
It's not a bug, it's just a style issue and
the && use in some compilers it
On 1/3/19 3:11 PM, Wentland, Harry wrote:
On 2019-01-03 2:48 p.m., Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Fix boolean expression by using logical AND operator '&&'
instead of bitwise operator '&'.
This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Fixes: 6d04ee9dc101 ("drm/amd/display: Restructuring a
On 2019-01-03 2:48 p.m., Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Fix boolean expression by using logical AND operator '&&'
> instead of bitwise operator '&'.
>
> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Fixes: 6d04ee9dc101 ("drm/amd/display: Restructuring and cleaning up DML")
> Cc: sta...@v
