On 08.07.25 10:56, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>>
>> There is no reason to test enabling signaling each of the element in a loop.
>> So there should be something like 4096 calls to the dma_fence_chain_cb
>> function each jumping to the next unsignaled fence and re-installing the
>> callback.
>
>
On Monday, 7 July 2025 15:14:11 CEST Christian König wrote:
> On 07.07.25 14:25, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > I've taken over that old issue and have a few questions to you.
>
> Thanks a lot for that, something really fishy seems to be going on here.
>
> > On Thursday, 27
On 07.07.25 14:25, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> I've taken over that old issue and have a few questions to you.
Thanks a lot for that, something really fishy seems to be going on here.
> On Thursday, 27 February 2025 15:11:39 CEST Christian König wrote:
...
>> Question is why is
Hi Christian,
I've taken over that old issue and have a few questions to you.
On Thursday, 27 February 2025 15:11:39 CEST Christian König wrote:
> Am 27.02.25 um 13:52 schrieb Andi Shyti:
> > Hi Nitin,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:25:34PM +0530, Nitin Gote wrote:
> >> Give the scheduler a c
Am 18.03.25 um 11:34 schrieb Nitin Gote:
> Give the scheduler a chance to breathe by calling cond_resched()
> as some of the loops may take some time on old machines (apl/bsw/pnv), and
> so catch the attention of the watchdogs.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/129
Am 06.03.25 um 16:11 schrieb Nitin Gote:
> Give the scheduler a chance to breath by adding delay of 10ms
> as some of the loops may take some time on old machines (like apl/bsw/pnv),
> and so catch the attention of the watchdogs.
>
> v1: Instead of cond_resched(), use more generic call like
> f
Hi,
> Am 27.02.25 um 13:52 schrieb Andi Shyti:
> > Hi Nitin,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:25:34PM +0530, Nitin Gote wrote:
> >> Give the scheduler a chance to breath by calling cond_resched() as
> >> some of the loops may take some time on old machines (like
> >> apl/bsw/pnv), and so catch
Am 27.02.25 um 13:52 schrieb Andi Shyti:
> Hi Nitin,
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:25:34PM +0530, Nitin Gote wrote:
>> Give the scheduler a chance to breath by calling cond_resched()
>> as some of the loops may take some time on old machines (like apl/bsw/pnv),
>> and so catch the attention of the
Hi Nitin,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:25:34PM +0530, Nitin Gote wrote:
> Give the scheduler a chance to breath by calling cond_resched()
> as some of the loops may take some time on old machines (like apl/bsw/pnv),
> and so catch the attention of the watchdogs.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedeskt
