On 8/26/20 10:54 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: kernel test robot
>
> Use kobj_to_dev() instead of container_of()
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/kobj_to_dev.cocci
>
> Fixes: a2fc3718bc22 ("coccinelle: api: add kobj_to_dev.cocci script")
> CC: Denis Efremov
> Signed-off-by: kernel
> It seems that 0-day picks up new semantic patches that are added to trees
> in kernel.org, but that it's strategy for generating the patch is not
> ideal. I'll just drop these Fixes lines.
* How do you think about to adjust also the prefix for subjects
of generated patches?
Another example
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/kobj_to_dev.cocci
> >
> > Fixes: a2fc3718bc22 ("coccinelle: api: add kobj_to_dev.cocci script")
>
> I wonder about such a combination of information.
>
> I find it reasonable that two function implementations sho
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/kobj_to_dev.cocci
>
> Fixes: a2fc3718bc22 ("coccinelle: api: add kobj_to_dev.cocci script")
I wonder about such a combination of information.
I find it reasonable that two function implementations should be adjusted
according to a generated patch.
Thus I ima
