On 28.10.2010 11:12, wrote sam tygier:
Without this patch i get no display (X or VT) on myEIZO S2242W monitor
when using KMS
This was discussed back in september, this is the second version of the
patch based on ajax's comments. i have opened a bug for the issue:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/sho
On 22/09/10 22:55, Adam Jackson wrote:
Yeah, I hate to just drop extension blocks, but it's better than the
alternative. They're optional for a reason I suppose.
For my EIZO S2242W the base block is fine, but the extension block is
all zeros. Without this patch I get no X and no VTs.
I suspe
On 22/09/10 22:55, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:42 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be
considered invalid. Instead just drop the
On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be
considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the
valid base block. The base block is modified to not claim to have
ex
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:42 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
> On 22/09/10 21:59, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
> >> Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be
> >> considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the
>
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:02 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
> Currently an invalid EDID extension will cause the whole EDID to be
> considered invalid. Instead just drop the extension, and return the
> valid base block. The base block is modified to not claim to have
> extensions, and update the checksum.
