On 5/18/22 00:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:19 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 5/16/22 06:31, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 06:10:23AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann
During a patch disc
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:19 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/16/22 06:31, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 06:10:23AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> From: Arnd Bergmann
> >>>
> >>> During a patch discussion, Linus bro
On 5/16/22 06:31, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 06:10:23AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann
During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, whi
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 06:10:23AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> > the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using var
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
> declaration inside of a for() loop. While the C99, C11 and later
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:41 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
> >
> >More precisely, the semantics of "extern inline" functions changed
> >between ISO C90 and ISO C99.
>
> Perhaps a clearer explanation to readers is: "extern inline" and "inline" swap
> semantics with gnu_inline (-fgnu89-inline or __attribu
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:43 AM Miguel Ojeda
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:32 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > -under ``-std=gnu89`` [gcc-c-dialect-options]_: the GNU dialect of ISO C90
> > -(including some C99 features). ``clang`` [clang]_ is also supported, see
> > +under ``-std=gnu11``
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:32 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> -under ``-std=gnu89`` [gcc-c-dialect-options]_: the GNU dialect of ISO C90
> -(including some C99 features). ``clang`` [clang]_ is also supported, see
> +under ``-std=gnu11`` [gcc-c-dialect-options]_: the GNU dialect of ISO C11
> +(includin
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 6:32 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
> declaration inside of a for() loop. While the C99, C11 and later standard
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 3:37 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> I think the KBUILD_USERCFLAGS portion and the modpost.c fix for it
> make sense regardless of the -std=gnu11 change
I do think they make sense, but I want to note again that people doing
cross builds obviously use different tools for user b
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 6:02 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:32 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> > the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
> > d
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 8:25 PM Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> This is great!
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> > the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:32 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
> declaration inside of a for() loop. While the C99, C11 and later standard
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:57:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:47 PM Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 11:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > Nathan Chancellor reported an additional -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> > > warning that appears in a system heade
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:36 PM Jani Nikula
> wrote:
> > >
> > > One minor issue that remains is an added gcc warning for shifts of
> > > negative integers when building with -Werror, which happens with the
> > > 'make W=1' option,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:36 PM Jani Nikula wrote:
> >
> > One minor issue that remains is an added gcc warning for shifts of
> > negative integers when building with -Werror, which happens with the
> > 'make W=1' option, as well as for three drivers in the kernel that always
> > enable -Werror, b
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiych7xehcmifj-ygxuy2jaj7pnkdkpcovt8fybvfw...@mail.gmail.com/
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1603
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds
> Cc:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
> declaration inside of a for() loop. While the C99, C11 and later standards
> introduce
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:47 PM Marco Elver wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 11:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Nathan Chancellor reported an additional -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> > warning that appears in a system header on arm, this still needs a
> > workaround.
>
> On the topic of Wdeclara
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:25 PM Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > Nathan Chancellor reported an additional -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> > warning that appears in a system header on arm, this still needs a
> > workaround.
>
> FWIW, I ha
Hi Arnd,
This is great!
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
> declaration inside of a for() loop. Whi
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
> declaration inside of a for() loop. While the C99, C11 and later
22 matches
Mail list logo
