On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 09:32 -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> On 10/9/2024 09:05, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > Currently the check to see if snapshot->copy has been allocated is
> > inverted and ends up dereferencing snapshot->copy when free'ing
> > objects in the array when it is null or not free'ing the
On 10/9/2024 09:05, Colin Ian King wrote:
Currently the check to see if snapshot->copy has been allocated is
inverted and ends up dereferencing snapshot->copy when free'ing
objects in the array when it is null or not free'ing the objects
when snapshot->copy is allocated. Fix this by using the cor
